Becoming A Fiction Writer
One girl, one dream … and a whole lot of procrastination
May 8, 2010 by amanda

April book of the month is an easy pick

If you happen to have been following my 2010 reading list, you’ll have found it a bit boring recently. After ploughing through a book at least every two days during most of the year, in April my reading came to a bit of a standstill. Which is hardly surprising considering what happened on 2 April. But anyway: my April reading totalled this -

However, I’m still going to announce The World Beneath as my book of the month, because it really was excellent. If it hadn’t been, I would never have found the time to read it this month! I’ve seen Cate Kennedy speak at writers’ festivals and she impresses me so much because she’s absolutely down-to-earth, and makes me feel like I, too, could actually publish a novel too – though probably not as good as hers.

While I’m at it, since April is over (oops – by more than a week!), let me give you an update on my writing for the month. You might be able to guess it was a bit of a slow month. However, one big improvement is that post-pregnancy, my poor carpal tunnel-affected wrists and fingers have improved considerably and I can stay back at the keyboard a lot longer. I did manage a significant piece of writing during April, but it was just for me – a summary, I guess, of the whole process of conceiving and giving birth my son, so that I don’t forget details of the experience. It was really refreshing firstly, to be able to sit at the keyboard and type for that long (interrupted by a crying baby rather than by pain), and it’s also been a long time since I wrote something “beautiful” that was for my eyes only – and it was a lot of fun.

Noticing that we are well into May is a bit scary, though – the Allen & Unwin/Australian/Vogel award closes on 31 May, and this year is the last year I’ll be eligible to submit a novel for the prize. After that I’ll (eek) be too old! This means that I really need to find some time to finalise the edits I want to make to my Bratislava novel. Soon. I’m not quite sure how I’ll do it, but they say the first six weeks with a newborn are the craziest and they’re nearly over, so I’m hoping I’ll find a few spare hours somewhere, somehow. And I’m also hoping that come the end of May, I’ll be able to report back with a bit more reading and writing progress than I had in April.

Tags: ,

  •   •   •   •   •
December 29, 2009 by amanda

Nam Le deserves $100,000 for his short stories

When it was announced around two years ago that the new government had created the Prime Minister’s Literary Prize worth A$100,000 for the best fiction and non-fiction books of the year, I was pretty impressed. It’s truly nice to see writers getting some monetary recognition of the thousands of hours of work that go into the writing of a novel – or in the case of the 2009 winner, Nam Le, a collection of short stories.

I’ve been having a bit of an ambivalent relationship with short stories recently. I’d like to write more of them, because they’re obviously a smaller investment of time than a novel, and therefore valuable in the sense of getting practice at polishing my writing and getting some fiction published. But then I feel like a bit of a fraud, because what I really want to do is write novels, and short stories really are an entirely different genre, and it’s not fair to treat them as a “mini novel” just to get some practice. So I’d more or less abandoned reading them when Nam Le’s collection The Boat was announced to be the winner of the 2009 Prime Minister’s Literary Award. Then I figured I had to read it.

Obviously, The Boat is an extremely well-written collection of stories. You can’t fault Nam Le’s writing. And if you look around the web at the various reviews, most people seem to think you can’t fault is diversity, either: the stories range from assassins in Colombia to Vietnamese women on boats to elderly men in America, so Nam Le is clearly able to write way beyond his personal experience.

But. I’m sorry to say there’s a “but”. I really want to adore this collection of stories. And I definitely think that Le deserves his $100,000, for he’s an extremely talented writer, and has got a lot of well-deserved praise. But, personally, I just felt like this collection is too diverse, too unconnected, and I know there’s no rule that says a collection of short stories should be connected but I just felt like they all belonged elsewhere. I mean, I guess if I read these stories elsewhere and independently, I would recognise Nam Le’s style and feel them to be a little connected, but as a book to hold in my hands and read, it just doesn’t do it for me. And my second (related) “but” is that knowing these stories all came from the same author disconcerted me a little; it’s hard to believe that one person could know so much about the life and culture in Iran, Colombia, Vietnam and Australia, all at once. Of course, in a way that’s the sign of a great fiction writer, but I just felt like I couldn’t quite trust him that it’s all how it really is. Okay, enough of my rambling, because obviously thousands of other people love this book, so I’ll leave you to decide for yourselves.

Tags: ,

  •   •   •   •   •
November 27, 2008 by amanda

My novel’s not an award winner, but here’s useful feedback

Remember how I insanely finished my novel to enter the TAG Hungerford contest? I knew that a last-minute finish was a bad thing for that novel, but the value for me of actually getting something finished to enter the contest far outweighed the inevitability of not getting anywhere with the contest. But now that the award procedure is almost over (there are three shortlisted novels now, although the winner won’t be announced until February 2009), I’ve got even more value out of the process.

I recently received a “thanks but no thanks” letter from the Hungerford crew, but with it came something very interesting – a judges’ report on the process. Not on my manuscript in particular, but a general overview of how the judges felt, and a few of the points they made were especially interesting to me:

  • There were 28 entries. Apparently this is less than the previous couple of years, but not a bad number. I was surprised it was so low. There are some two million people living in Western Australia now, and the only requirement for entry is that you have not previously published a book. But perhaps it’s really not that common to get a full-length novel ready for submission. Anyway, it’s almost encouraging that there might be less competition out there than I thought.
  • Most of the entries were “realist fictions”, a category into which my manuscript would also land. The judges mentioned that many seemed to be written based on personal experience (yes, some of mine falls in this category too). Trying to write further away from my personal experience is something I’ve been trying to do with this NaNoWriMo novel and it’s been quite freeing. But it’s not easy – after all, doesn’t every writing class say, “Write what you know”?
  • Major problems including careless plotting, poorly-constructed characters, badly-handled dialogue and bad spelling and punctuation. My passion for apostrophes and their relatives rules me out of the last one, I’m fairly confident, but the first three problems – well, I probably still need practice with all of these. But apparently so do lots of other writers!

Future novel contests for me

So, practice, practice, and more practice is needed, I think, to improve my writing skills, and a whole lot of editing too. But entering these kinds of contests – respectable ones that could lead to a “big break” for a writing career – is an important goal of my writing, so I’d like to keep the future contests in mind:

  • The TAG Hungerford contest is running every two years at the moment, so presumably my next deadline there is June 2010.
  • The Australian/Vogel award, which is for writers under the age of 35 (a couple more years!), is usually held every year, so I hope to have a novel ready – no, I will have a novel ready – for May 2009. And May 2010. And I think I still scrape in for May 2011, but that’ll be the last one.

Know any more good novel contests? Please let me know in the comments.

  •   •   •   •   •
July 12, 2008 by amanda

Best of the Booker and remembering books

It was announced this week that Salman Rushdie’s book Midnight’s Children has (again) won the Best of the Booker (this time for the 40th anniversary of the prize). I looked at the shortlist a while back – for some reason, just six previous Booker winners were nominated to be potential Best of the Bookers, which seems a bit unfair – but in any case, I couldn’t decide that any of them were better than the others, and didn’t vote.

But apparently 36% of the voters decided on Midnight’s Children, a pretty high proportion. The frustrating thing for me is that I know I’ve read this book, and have a very, very vague impression of it still left in my brain, but if I had to describe anything about it to anyone, I’d be utterly lost. Basically I’d just say “it’s about India”, a dismal summary if I ever heard one.

The thing is, there are hundreds of books that I can’t remember much about at all, even though at the time I found them absolutely fascinating. This problem is dramatically increased if I read a book within a day or two, so for that reason I limit my reading of books that I’m loving, so that they’ll stick better in my brain. But still, come back a few months later and there are so many cases where I could look at the cover of a book, know my opinion about it, but can’t tell you anything about the characters or plot. I find this rather distressing, I have to say, and hate to think that people will do the same to my books in the future!

Am I the only one out there who has this weird kind of book amnesia?

  •   •   •   •   •
July 6, 2008 by amanda

You’ve got the best book … no you haven’t

I’m quite obsessed with news about awards for writers. I guess partly that’s because I hope that one day (in the far distant future …) I might actually win one, and partly because I’m always intrigued to see how much our society values writers – or should I say, how little many parts of our society value writers, especially compared to actors or musicians. But that’s a rant for another day.

I just heard about a terrible awards night when the wrong writer was announced as the winner. It was at the Wales Book of the Year ceremony last week and the local Culture Minister got mixed up somehow and announced one of the runners-up as the winner; as he was just about to reach the stage to get his prize, they had to announce that it was a mistake, and someone else was in fact the winner.

As I read this story, I imagined it happening to me, and how heartbreaking it would be! Nobody expects to be the winner, but you would quickly adjust to the excitement of being the winner if you heard your name called. (Suddenly being 9,000 pounds poorer wouldn’t be pleasant either – the difference between the winner’s prize money and the runners-up’ prize). As the author himself said – this would never happen at the Oscars – how true, and that’s what I mean about where writers fit in the whole scheme of things. But don’t worry, I’m not going to switch to acting all of a sudden.

  •   •   •   •   •
May 21, 2008 by amanda

More awards: Christina Stead prize worth A$40,000

Since I’ve started paying attention to the awards available to writers – particularly Australian novelists, because it’s good to have dreams of what I could achieve one day! – I’ve been pleasantly surprised to see that some very good writers are getting decent amounts of money to reward their achievements in creating great literature. Of course, I’m aware that most great writers don’t earn anywhere near as much as they should, but I’d somehow thought that the situation was absolutely dire and nobody got anything. But if you check my posts on awards, there are a few writers – even Australians! – who are getting a decent bonus now and again.

So here’s another one: over in Sydney they announced the New South Wales Premier’s literary awards this week, including $40,000 for the Christina Stead prize for fiction. The winner of this, Michelle de Kretser, got another $10,000 for winning Book of the Year too, with another book that’s had to be added to my long reading wish list, The Lost Dog. What’s more, the minister responsible announced that prize money for all the NSW literary awards is being doubled. There should be more of it – but I’m glad there’s an upward trend, at least.

  •   •   •   •   •
April 18, 2008 by amanda

Australia-Asia Literary Award sounds like a step in the right direction

What’s happening to my country? Are we actually supporting literature? This week in my state, a new award was announced: the Western Australian Premier’s Australia-Asia Literary Award. It’s for books published by Australian or Asian writers, or largely set in these regions, published in the preceding year, and the especially nice part is it’s worth A$110,000. This makes it one of the richest prizes of its kind – even the Man Booker Prize is only worth a little bit more.

It was only a few months back I mentioned the new Prime Minister’s Literary Prize of $100,000, so I’m getting quite a few warm fuzzies from politicians at the moment. Of course, they do dumb things too – like not funding long-running and vital organisations like FAWWA or stopping funding for important magazines like Westerly … but I’m at least grateful that they’re getting some things right. I’m not naive enough to hope for a perfect world. And on a personal note, I’ve just got to keep writing and daydreaming of one day winning one of these prizes myself. This weekend should see a return to that pesky novel …

  •   •   •   •   •
April 9, 2008 by amanda

Oscar Wao’s brief wondrous life probably gets extended with Pulitzer win

Over on my travel writing blog, I reviewed The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao a couple of months ago. It’s a first novel by Junot Díaz that takes place mostly in the Dominican Republic, and was something my friend Katrina passed on to me because it was hyped up as being a great novel – one of my favourite novelists, Hanif Kureishi, had really said good things about it. Despite that, Katrina told me it wasn’t that great, but thought it might be interesting for me to look at it anyhow.

She was right, I think – in my opinion, it wasn’t so fantastic. Not bad, but sometimes confusing in the storyline and characters, riddled with footnotes (my strong opinion is that the author should decide whether or not something is important or not and then either include it in the main story or delete it – a novel is not an academic work!) and not compellingly page-turning. Not bad, but not great.

Well, who I am to judge. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao just won the 2008 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction. Hmm. I’m curious now to read some of the other finalists, like Tree of Smoke by Denis Johnson and Shakespeare’s Kitchen: Stories by Lore Segal. The Pulizter winner gets $10,000 so it’s not as wealthy a prize as I’d expected – but obviously the prestige is priceless.

  •   •   •   •   •
March 23, 2008 by amanda

Mail-sorting poets and the importance of writing

I think it’s just lovely when I read newspaper articles about writers who’ve won awards with prize money that’s actually worth something. Writers seem to draw the short straw so often – as do many creative arts – because people do it because they’re passionate, and not for the financial reward. Yet a financial reward, and the freedom to live without being scared of the next bill coming in, while creating incredible books and stories and poetry that can change the world, is pretty important. Right?

Okay, my rant’s over now. I was just pleased because I read a story about a mail-sorting poet in New Zealand who won NZ$65,000 for his book of poems called Abandoned Novel. (Hmm, I have a real abandoned novel, wonder if I can get anything for that?!). David Beach is called the mail-sorting poet because he’s worked for many years both for Australia Post and New Zealand post, sorting mail – I guess that’s the kind of work that leaves your brain free for daydreaming and poem composing. In any case, I loved this quote from him:

That a book of poems can win a $65,000 prize makes me feel as if I’ve stumbled into a parallel universe where poetry is considered important.

And while he’s talking about the problem of poetry often being overlooked in favour of novels or short stories, I still want to be in his parallel universe, where all writing is considered important. All arts, for that matter. In this parallel universe, people would tell me “you’re working hard at home writing today” instead of “you’ve got the day off”. But I did say my rant was over.

  •   •   •   •   •
March 13, 2008 by amanda

Sonya Hartnett a literary and financial success

Not long ago I mentioned that nice new Australian prize, worth $100,000, known as the Prime Minister’s Literary Prize. And while that would certainly help a good Aussie writer to survive a couple of years longer without having to take another job, I was pretty excited to hear that an Australian author has just picked up a prize worth $880,000. That’s serious money!

Melbourne-based young adult writer Sonya Hartnett just won the Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award from the Swedish government.

She’s not a writer I’m familiar with – yet! – but according to a bio, she actually had her first book published when she was just 15 years old. That does give her around 25 years of professional experience, and probably a lot of years in which she earned a mere fraction of $880,000. But it does give aspiring Aussie writers a bit of hope – well, that’s how I feel, anyway.

  •   •   •   •   •